Track 03Closed

7 Funding Exploits (on majors)

systematically sweep 7 mechanics around funding/settlement looking for a structural edge

Key metric

0 / 7

Why an edge should exist / hypothesis
Funding inefficiency around settlement should, in theory, yield several tradable patterns.
Construction
7 mechanics (mean-reversion, settlement arb, dump, spot-hedge, ADL front-run, time-arb, direction-signal) on 10 symbols.
Test data
Bybit OHLC + funding, 10 symbols, 6 months, cost model ~16 bps/trade.
Results
0/7. S6 (mean-reversion, Sharpe 1.53) = hidden directional long bias (144/144 LONG, Feb −35%). S5 (settlement arb) WR=0%.
Validation
BTC: 0 events >2bps in 6 months — majors are efficient.
Root cause
The funding edge lives only on illiquid microcaps (which Funding Capture already harvests via execution); on majors the market is efficient.
Verdict
Dead; confirmed the boundary — funding edge exists only on illiquids.
Source
scripts/research/exploit_7_strategies.py · RESEARCH.md 2026-04-22

Want the same check on your strategy?

Validation →