策略 09已关闭
Cascade Tick Bars
tick/imbalance bars catch the start of a liquidation cascade for a directional entry
策略正文暂以英文显示,中文翻译进行中。
关键指标:
3 days: WR 100% (false) → 90 days: WR 47%, net −0.10%/trade, Sharpe −3.4
- 为何存在优势 / 假设
- Information-driven bars (de Prado) should detect a flow surge earlier than time bars.
- 构造
- Tick bars (500) + imbalance bars → cascade trigger → directional entry.
- 测试数据
- 5 coins; 3 days (pilot) and 90 days (144 trades).
- 结果
- On 3 days WR=100%, Sharpe 1.27 — a small-sample false signal. On 90 days WR=47%, net −0.10%/trade, Sharpe −3.4. MFE≈MAE → direction after the trigger is random.
- 验证
- Overfitting on a short sample; on the full sample — noise.
- 根因
- No directional information after the cascade trigger; a small sample fooled us.
- 结论
- Dead. A showcase case: why a 3-day 100% WR means nothing. The infra (streaming aggTrades parser) was reused.
- 来源
archive/CASCADE_TICK_BARS_RESEARCH.md
想对你的策略做同样的检验吗?
验证 →